Every week, founders send me decks asking for the honest read. And every week I see the same pattern: five friendly people said “looks great, maybe tighten slide 12,” then forty investors said nothing at all.
The gap between those two reactions is a two-minute skim you never get to watch.
So we built the skim.
We call it the Deck Review. You upload a PDF or PPTX (or paste the text), pick the round you’re raising, and it returns the review nobody sends founders:
▫️ The extraction test: how much of your deck a two-minute skim, or the AI triage more funds run every month, can actually pull out. If the skim can’t find your ask, your ask doesn’t exist.
▫️ Seven scores calibrated to your round, because a seed deck judged by Series A standards is useless feedback, and most deck feedback makes exactly that mistake.
▫️ The blunt one-line read, the sentence a partner would actually say after the skim, in quotes, no cushioning.
▫️ The three sharpest fixes and the three questions this specific deck invites in the meeting, so you walk in with answers instead of surprises.
And this is what comes back a minute later, on a fictional seed deck:
We call it the Deck Review. You upload a PDF or PPTX (or paste the text), pick the round you’re raising, and it returns the review nobody sends founders:
▫️ The extraction test: how much of your deck a two-minute skim, or the AI triage more funds run every month, can actually pull out. If the skim can’t find your ask, your ask doesn’t exist.
▫️ Seven scores calibrated to your round, because a seed deck judged by Series A standards is useless feedback, and most deck feedback makes exactly that mistake.
▫️ The blunt one-line read, the sentence a partner would actually say after the skim, in quotes, no cushioning.
▫️ The three sharpest fixes and the three questions this specific deck invites in the meeting, so you walk in with answers instead of surprises.