A family office can decide on your round over one lunch. That is the whole reason this list exists, and it is also the reason most founders never get near one.
The money is enormous and patient, the decision usually sits with one or two people, and the process skips the partner meeting, the investment committee, and the fund-cycle timing that governs everything a VC does. What family offices have instead is close to zero public surface: a website with no names on it if there is a website at all, and gatekeepers who are very good at their jobs.
So founders default back to chasing funds that reject 99% of what they see, because at least the funds are findable.
Why this corner of the market stays open
That fourth row is the entire opportunity. Difficulty of access is what keeps competition out, and every founder who gives up there leaves the office to whoever kept going.
Worth saying plainly: family offices are slower to trust and faster to decide. They will take three months to answer a cold message and forty-eight hours to commit once they do. Founders who expect the speed to show up at the start read the first silence as rejection and stop following up one message too early, which is the single most common way this list gets wasted.
What is inside the list
144 named people at family offices that deploy at pre-seed and seed, each row checked by hand rather than scraped from a directory.
Every row carries a person rather than a firm. That distinction matters more than the count: info@ addresses and generic firm entries are why most investor lists produce nothing, since the message arrives somewhere with no owner.
The geographic spread runs across the US, Germany, the UK, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Lithuania, Turkey, India, China, Singapore, Brazil, Peru and Australia, which means the list works whether you are raising in Berlin, São Paulo or the Bay Area.
Everything below the line is the part that turns the list into replies
The list on its own saves you about forty hours of research. The system below is what decides whether those 144 contacts become three conversations or twenty.
The qualification pass. How to cut 144 rows down to the 30 worth your effort, before writing a single message
The enrichment step that separates a message that lands from a merge field with better manners, with the exact prompt
The first message, including the connection-request detail most founders get backwards, and why the note you want to write actively hurts you
The follow-up sequence, with timings, and the specific message that reopens a dead thread
The warm-path map, turning your own LinkedIn export into a ranked list of who already knows these people
What to do when the list runs dry, which happens to everyone around week five
Cancel anytime. First subscribers get 50% off forever.
Your subscription also opens the full library:
▫️ A new investor list every week, 10,000+ named investors across family offices, LPs, funds of funds and VCs, including the 2,000+ European family office database and 300+ VCs that accept cold pitches
▫️ The 375 Prompt Book for Fundraising and every playbook across a raise
▫️ 200+ pitch decks that raised capital and financial models ready to adapt